What is the minimum investment capital requirement for a PMA company in the hospitality sector in Indonesia?

Under Indonesia's current investment regulations, a PT PMA (Perseroan Terbatas Penanaman Modal Asing — foreign-owned limited liability company) is required to meet a minimum total investment value of IDR 10 billion (approximately USD 640,000 at current rates ) excluding land and buildings, and a minimum paid-up capital of IDR 2.5 billion . For hospitality and resort development specifically, the practical capital requirement is substantially higher than the regulatory minimum: most institutional-grade resort development programmes in Bali require a development capitalisation of USD 3 million to USD 15 million depending on key count, amenity programme, and construction specification. The regulatory minimum should be understood as a floor below which the PMA cannot be registered, not as a realistic capitalisation level for resort development. Additionally, the foreign ownership percentage permissible in the hospitality sector is subject to the current Negative Investment List (DNI) and its successor frameworks; as of 2024, 100 percent foreign ownership is permitted in the hotel and resort development sector for investments meeting the minimum investment threshold . Foreign investors should confirm the current permitted ownership percentage with their Indonesian legal counsel at the time of incorporation, as the DNI framework is periodically revised.

How long does it take to form a PMA company and begin development activities in Bali?

The PMA formation timeline in Indonesia has been substantially shortened by the Online Single Submission (OSS) system introduced under Government Regulation 5/2021. From the submission of complete documentation, PMA registration and the issuance of the NIB (Nomor Induk Berusaha — Business Identification Number) can be completed in 3 to 10 business days through the OSS portal under the risk-based licensing framework . However, the overall timeline from the decision to form a PMA to the commencement of actual development activity is substantially longer than the registration phase alone suggests. Securing the deed of establishment (Akta Pendirian) from a Notary requires prior agreement on the company's constitutional documents and shareholder structure, typically 1 to 2 weeks. Post-registration requirements include bank account opening (2 to 4 weeks for a new entity), tax registration (NPWP — typically issued within the NIB process under OSS), and sectoral licensing that is specific to the hotel and resort sector — including the tourism business registration with the local tourism office — which adds 2 to 6 weeks depending on the regency. Environmental licensing (AMDAL or UKL-UPL depending on project scale) runs on a separate track with timelines of 3 to 12 months depending on project classification. The practical working assumption for an institutional developer is that the PMA will be formed and nominally operational within 4 to 8 weeks of initiating the process, but that the full set of licences required to commence construction — including building permits (PBG) and environmental approvals — will require 6 to 18 months from PMA formation depending on project complexity.

What are the key KBLI sector codes for resort and hospitality development through a PMA?

The KBLI (Klasifikasi Baku Lapangan Usaha Indonesia — Indonesian Standard Industrial Classification) codes relevant to a resort development PMA fall into several categories that typically need to be registered together to cover the full scope of development and operational activity. The primary hospitality codes include KBLI 55110 (Hotel Bintang — Star-rated hotel operations), KBLI 55120 (Hotel Non-Bintang — non-rated hotel operations, relevant for boutique formats), and KBLI 55194 (Penginapan Wisata Alam — nature tourism accommodation, which is the most relevant category for eco-resort formats). For resort developments that include food and beverage operations, KBLI 56101 (Restoran) and KBLI 56102 (Rumah Makan) are typically included. For developments with wellness or spa programming, KBLI 96120 (Jasa Perawatan Tubuh — body care services) is required. For property development activities prior to the hotel operation phase, KBLI 68111 (Real Estat yang Dimiliki Sendiri atau Disewa — real estate owned or leased) may be required. The selection of KBLI codes is not a purely administrative decision — it defines the permissible scope of the PMA's business activities and, importantly, determines which risk tier the business falls into under the OSS-RBA system, which in turn determines the licensing requirements the PMA must satisfy. Counsel experienced in Bali hospitality PMA formation should review the KBLI selection before finalising the deed of establishment.

Can a foreign individual hold shares in a PMA, and are there structuring considerations that affect this?

Yes, a foreign individual — as distinct from a foreign corporate entity — can hold shares in a PT PMA. The shareholding structure of a PT PMA can include both individual and corporate shareholders, and either or both can be foreign nationals or foreign-incorporated entities. The practical structuring considerations that affect this choice are primarily about governance, tax efficiency, and exit liquidity. Holding shares through a foreign corporate entity (a BVI, Cayman, or Singapore holding company, for example) offers several advantages over direct individual shareholding: it provides a legal entity through which to manage the investment, facilitates group-level tax planning, creates a clean share transfer mechanism for secondary sales without requiring Indonesian share transfer procedures, and makes the investment more legible to institutional buyers and lenders who are accustomed to standard offshore holding structures. Individual shareholding is simpler to establish initially and avoids the cost of maintaining an offshore holding structure, but it can complicate exit because the buyer of a direct Indonesian PMA shareholding must be willing to step into the Indonesian corporate framework rather than simply acquiring shares in an offshore holding vehicle. For development programmes that are explicitly designed for institutional exit — a sale to a regional hotel operator, a branded residence platform, or a private equity-backed hospitality company — the offshore holding structure is strongly preferred and should be established from the outset rather than restructured at exit.

What structural choices made during PMA formation have the most significant impact on exit liquidity 10 years out?

The structural choices that most significantly affect exit liquidity are: share structure and transfer mechanics, land tenure documentation, and the relationship between the PMA's registered business activity and the actual asset profile at exit. On share structure: a PMA with a clean, simple shareholding structure — ideally a single offshore holding company owning 100 percent of the PMA — is substantially easier and cheaper to transfer at exit than one with fragmented shareholding, multiple nominee arrangements, or complex shareholder loan structures that need to be unwound. The simplest structure at formation is worth its weight in exit legal fees. On land tenure: HGB certificates that are clearly in the PMA's name, with current registration, current land tax (PBB) compliance, and no encumbrances other than a clearly registered Hak Tanggungan from a legitimate lender, represent clean bankable security. HGB that has been extended or is near its first extension date at exit requires the buyer to factor in the extension process. HGB that has informal sub-arrangements — ground lease supplements, revenue sharing with the original Hak Milik holder, nominee arrangements not reflected in the title register — introduces uncertainty that buyers will price as a discount or exclude from consideration. On KBLI and business activity alignment: at exit, a buyer will conduct legal due diligence that maps the PMA's registered business activities against what the company actually does. A PMA whose registered KBLI codes match its actual operations — resort accommodation, F&B, wellness, property development — presents a clean due diligence picture. A PMA that has operated outside its registered scope, or that needs restructuring to reflect the actual asset, creates a due diligence exception that buyers use to renegotiate price.

Intelligence Library

Zoning, Law & Frameworks · 12 min read · 22 April 2026

Complete Guide to PMA Company Formation for Resort Developers

A practitioner's walk-through of the PMA formation process for foreign resort developers: capital requirements, sector codes, timelines, and the structural choices that define your exit liquidity a decade out.

Forming a PT PMA for resort development in Indonesia is a process that most international legal and investment advisory firms can complete. It is not a technical mystery. What distinguishes the practitioners who consistently produce clean, investable PMA structures from those who produce structures that become obstacles at exit is not knowledge of the process steps — those are documented and available — but the structural choices made at formation that compound over the subsequent decade into either an asset or a liability.

This guide addresses both dimensions: the process mechanics that every formation adviser will walk through, and the structural decision points where the choices made in weeks one and two will define the quality of the deal a developer is able to exit into in year ten. For a developer entering Sidemen at the current stage of the market, the time horizon for that exit is precisely when the structural decisions will matter most — when the corridor has matured, operator interest is institutional, and the capital markets are available to reward well-structured assets.

Understanding the PMA Framework

A PT PMA — Perseroan Terbatas Penanaman Modal Asing — is the standard Indonesian corporate vehicle through which foreign capital accesses the Indonesian economy. It is not a special-purpose vehicle or a foreign investment licence overlaid on a domestic structure; it is a full Indonesian limited liability company that is permitted to have foreign shareholders. The PMA designation describes the ownership characteristic rather than a different legal entity type.

The legal framework governing PMA formation has been substantially modernised. The Investment Law (Law 25/2007), the Company Law (Law 40/2007), and the landmark Omnibus Law (Law 11/2020) and its implementing regulations — particularly Government Regulation 5/2021 on Risk-Based Business Licensing — together define the current PMA formation and operation framework. The Online Single Submission (OSS) system is the primary interaction point for formation, licensing, and compliance reporting.

For a resort developer, the PMA is the entity that will hold the HGB land title, enter into construction and management contracts, employ Indonesian staff, hold banking relationships, and ultimately be the asset that is transferred, merged, or liquidated at exit. Its quality as a corporate structure — the cleanliness of its governance documents, the completeness of its licensing, the alignment between its registered activities and actual operations — determines its value as an exit vehicle as much as the underlying resort asset does.

The Formation Process: Step by Step

Pre-Formation Decisions

Before engaging a Notary to draft the deed of establishment, four fundamental decisions need to be made: shareholding structure (who owns what percentage, in what entity form), company name, registered business activities (KBLI codes), and initial capital structure.

The shareholding structure decision intersects with the offshore holding structure question — a decision that has exit liquidity implications examined later in this piece. For a development programme designed for institutional exit, the preference is to establish a clean offshore holding entity (typically Singapore, BVI, or Cayman) as the single PMA shareholder from the outset. This adds 4 to 8 weeks and USD 5,000 to USD 15,000 to the formation timeline and cost , but eliminates the restructuring cost at exit.

The KBLI code selection defines the PMA’s permissible business scope. For a resort development programme, the relevant codes span development activity (real estate), primary hospitality operations (hotel/resort accommodation), food and beverage, and wellness services. Including all relevant codes at formation is far less costly than amending the company’s business scope after registration.

Notarial Deed of Establishment

The Notary (who must hold PPAT status for land transaction purposes) drafts the Akta Pendirian — the deed of establishment — based on the agreed Articles of Association. The Articles specify the shareholders, their shareholding percentages, the company’s name and domicile, its registered capital and paid-up capital, the composition and authority of the Board of Directors and Board of Commissioners, and the business scope defined by KBLI codes.

The deed requires at minimum two shareholders to form a PT structure, and both shareholders (or their authorised representatives under power of attorney) must appear before the Notary or execute the deed remotely through a certified notarial power of attorney. For offshore shareholders, the power of attorney must be apostilled in the jurisdiction of execution.

The Notary then submits the deed to the Ministry of Law and Human Rights (Kemenkumham) for legal entity ratification. The ratification is typically issued within 1 to 5 business days through the online submission system.

OSS Registration and NIB

Following Kemenkumham ratification, the PMA is registered through the OSS portal to obtain the NIB (Business Identification Number). The NIB is the unified business identifier that replaces the prior multi-document registration requirement (TDP, SIUP, SIUP-M) and serves simultaneously as the company’s customs identification, proof of business registration, and importer identification number.

Under the OSS-RBA framework, hospitality and resort development activities are generally classified as medium-high risk (Risiko Menengah Tinggi), which means that the NIB is issued provisionally upon registration and confirmed as fully operational upon completion of post-registration inspections and sectoral licence requirements. The provisional NIB is sufficient to open a corporate bank account and begin preparatory activities including land acquisition.

Post-Registration Sectoral Licensing

The NIB alone does not complete the licensing picture for a resort developer. Additional sectoral licences required before construction commencement typically include:

The Tourism Business Registration (Tanda Daftar Usaha Pariwisata — TDUP) issued by the local tourism office at the regency level. For Sidemen-area development, this is the Dinas Pariwisata of Karangasem Regency. Processing time: typically 2 to 4 weeks from complete documentation submission.

The Environmental Approval — either AMDAL (environmental impact assessment) for projects meeting the relevant scale thresholds, or UKL-UPL (environmental management and monitoring plan) for smaller projects. The classification depends on project land area, key count, and nature of the development programme. Environmental approval is the longest-lead licensing item in the development process, with AMDAL processes taking 6 to 12 months from document submission and public consultation completion .

The Building Permit (Persetujuan Bangunan Gedung — PBG, which replaced IMB under the Omnibus Law framework), issued by the regency-level technical agency after environmental approval is obtained.

Capital Structure Considerations

The minimum regulatory capitalisation thresholds — IDR 10 billion total investment, IDR 2.5 billion paid-up capital — define the floor but not the structure. For a resort development programme, the capital structure will typically involve a combination of equity invested by the shareholders and project finance debt from Indonesian lenders secured over the PMA’s HGB land and building rights.

The capitalisation structure should be designed from the outset with the following considerations: the debt-to-equity ratio that lenders will accept for resort project finance in Indonesia (typically 60:40 to 70:30 debt to equity for construction lending ); the dividend distribution mechanics that allow equity investors to repatriate returns in USD rather than IDR (which requires attention to exchange control regulations and the terms of any double taxation treaty between Indonesia and the investors’ home jurisdictions); and the loan structure for any intercompany lending from offshore entities to the PMA, which is subject to Indonesian transfer pricing regulations and requires arms-length documentation.

The Exit Liquidity Lens

The formation decisions that most profoundly affect exit liquidity are not the ones that feel significant at formation — the exact wording of specific clauses — but the structural ones that define the asset profile a buyer will encounter.

A buyer acquiring a Bali resort at exit will conduct legal due diligence across four dimensions: clean title (HGB certificates in the PMA’s name, extensions current, no informal encumbrances); clean corporate structure (KBLI alignment, no undisclosed shareholders or nominee arrangements, current tax compliance); clean regulatory compliance (all required licences current, no enforcement matters outstanding); and clean financial records (audited accounts showing the asset value and operational performance that support the purchase price).

Each of these dimensions can be engineered for or against from formation. The developer who treats formation as a compliance exercise — checking the minimum required boxes — will often find at exit that the due diligence exceptions created by structural shortcuts cost far more than they saved. The developer who treats formation as the first investment decision in a 10-year value creation programme will find that a clean, simple, well-documented PMA is itself a component of the exit value.

What This Means for Institutional Capital

PMA formation for a resort development programme in Indonesia is a 4 to 8 week process that is well within the capability of the existing professional infrastructure available in Bali and Jakarta. The knowledge required to complete the process is available and affordable. What is not always available — and what distinguishes the most successful institutional developers from those who create structural problems they solve expensively at exit — is the discipline to make the structural choices that optimise for the 10-year horizon from the first meeting with the Notary.

The investor entering Sidemen today is, simultaneously, beginning the formation of an entity that will need to be an attractive acquisition target when the corridor is at its mature pricing. That horizon should govern every structural decision in the formation process.

Frequently Asked

The FAQ entries are rendered automatically below by the ArticleLayout component from the frontmatter faq block.

FAQ

Frequently Asked

What is the minimum investment capital requirement for a PMA company in the hospitality sector in Indonesia?: Under Indonesia's current investment regulations, a PT PMA (Perseroan Terbatas Penanaman Modal Asing — foreign-owned limited liability company) is required to meet a minimum total investment value of IDR 10 billion (approximately USD 640,000 at current rates ) excluding land and buildings, and a minimum paid-up capital of IDR 2.5 billion . For hospitality and resort development specifically, the practical capital requirement is substantially higher than the regulatory minimum: most institutional-grade resort development programmes in Bali require a development capitalisation of USD 3 million to USD 15 million depending on key count, amenity programme, and construction specification. The regulatory minimum should be understood as a floor below which the PMA cannot be registered, not as a realistic capitalisation level for resort development. Additionally, the foreign ownership percentage permissible in the hospitality sector is subject to the current Negative Investment List (DNI) and its successor frameworks; as of 2024, 100 percent foreign ownership is permitted in the hotel and resort development sector for investments meeting the minimum investment threshold . Foreign investors should confirm the current permitted ownership percentage with their Indonesian legal counsel at the time of incorporation, as the DNI framework is periodically revised.
How long does it take to form a PMA company and begin development activities in Bali?: The PMA formation timeline in Indonesia has been substantially shortened by the Online Single Submission (OSS) system introduced under Government Regulation 5/2021. From the submission of complete documentation, PMA registration and the issuance of the NIB (Nomor Induk Berusaha — Business Identification Number) can be completed in 3 to 10 business days through the OSS portal under the risk-based licensing framework . However, the overall timeline from the decision to form a PMA to the commencement of actual development activity is substantially longer than the registration phase alone suggests. Securing the deed of establishment (Akta Pendirian) from a Notary requires prior agreement on the company's constitutional documents and shareholder structure, typically 1 to 2 weeks. Post-registration requirements include bank account opening (2 to 4 weeks for a new entity), tax registration (NPWP — typically issued within the NIB process under OSS), and sectoral licensing that is specific to the hotel and resort sector — including the tourism business registration with the local tourism office — which adds 2 to 6 weeks depending on the regency. Environmental licensing (AMDAL or UKL-UPL depending on project scale) runs on a separate track with timelines of 3 to 12 months depending on project classification. The practical working assumption for an institutional developer is that the PMA will be formed and nominally operational within 4 to 8 weeks of initiating the process, but that the full set of licences required to commence construction — including building permits (PBG) and environmental approvals — will require 6 to 18 months from PMA formation depending on project complexity.
What are the key KBLI sector codes for resort and hospitality development through a PMA?: The KBLI (Klasifikasi Baku Lapangan Usaha Indonesia — Indonesian Standard Industrial Classification) codes relevant to a resort development PMA fall into several categories that typically need to be registered together to cover the full scope of development and operational activity. The primary hospitality codes include KBLI 55110 (Hotel Bintang — Star-rated hotel operations), KBLI 55120 (Hotel Non-Bintang — non-rated hotel operations, relevant for boutique formats), and KBLI 55194 (Penginapan Wisata Alam — nature tourism accommodation, which is the most relevant category for eco-resort formats). For resort developments that include food and beverage operations, KBLI 56101 (Restoran) and KBLI 56102 (Rumah Makan) are typically included. For developments with wellness or spa programming, KBLI 96120 (Jasa Perawatan Tubuh — body care services) is required. For property development activities prior to the hotel operation phase, KBLI 68111 (Real Estat yang Dimiliki Sendiri atau Disewa — real estate owned or leased) may be required. The selection of KBLI codes is not a purely administrative decision — it defines the permissible scope of the PMA's business activities and, importantly, determines which risk tier the business falls into under the OSS-RBA system, which in turn determines the licensing requirements the PMA must satisfy. Counsel experienced in Bali hospitality PMA formation should review the KBLI selection before finalising the deed of establishment.
Can a foreign individual hold shares in a PMA, and are there structuring considerations that affect this?: Yes, a foreign individual — as distinct from a foreign corporate entity — can hold shares in a PT PMA. The shareholding structure of a PT PMA can include both individual and corporate shareholders, and either or both can be foreign nationals or foreign-incorporated entities. The practical structuring considerations that affect this choice are primarily about governance, tax efficiency, and exit liquidity. Holding shares through a foreign corporate entity (a BVI, Cayman, or Singapore holding company, for example) offers several advantages over direct individual shareholding: it provides a legal entity through which to manage the investment, facilitates group-level tax planning, creates a clean share transfer mechanism for secondary sales without requiring Indonesian share transfer procedures, and makes the investment more legible to institutional buyers and lenders who are accustomed to standard offshore holding structures. Individual shareholding is simpler to establish initially and avoids the cost of maintaining an offshore holding structure, but it can complicate exit because the buyer of a direct Indonesian PMA shareholding must be willing to step into the Indonesian corporate framework rather than simply acquiring shares in an offshore holding vehicle. For development programmes that are explicitly designed for institutional exit — a sale to a regional hotel operator, a branded residence platform, or a private equity-backed hospitality company — the offshore holding structure is strongly preferred and should be established from the outset rather than restructured at exit.
What structural choices made during PMA formation have the most significant impact on exit liquidity 10 years out?: The structural choices that most significantly affect exit liquidity are: share structure and transfer mechanics, land tenure documentation, and the relationship between the PMA's registered business activity and the actual asset profile at exit. On share structure: a PMA with a clean, simple shareholding structure — ideally a single offshore holding company owning 100 percent of the PMA — is substantially easier and cheaper to transfer at exit than one with fragmented shareholding, multiple nominee arrangements, or complex shareholder loan structures that need to be unwound. The simplest structure at formation is worth its weight in exit legal fees. On land tenure: HGB certificates that are clearly in the PMA's name, with current registration, current land tax (PBB) compliance, and no encumbrances other than a clearly registered Hak Tanggungan from a legitimate lender, represent clean bankable security. HGB that has been extended or is near its first extension date at exit requires the buyer to factor in the extension process. HGB that has informal sub-arrangements — ground lease supplements, revenue sharing with the original Hak Milik holder, nominee arrangements not reflected in the title register — introduces uncertainty that buyers will price as a discount or exclude from consideration. On KBLI and business activity alignment: at exit, a buyer will conduct legal due diligence that maps the PMA's registered business activities against what the company actually does. A PMA whose registered KBLI codes match its actual operations — resort accommodation, F&B, wellness, property development — presents a clean due diligence picture. A PMA that has operated outside its registered scope, or that needs restructuring to reflect the actual asset, creates a due diligence exception that buyers use to renegotiate price.

Request Feasibility Report